[Cuis] Fwd: Re: DIRECT version number

[H. Hirzel]

1) and 2) sounds like there is a need for an Ubuntu type of approach.

Labelled releases at regular intervals -- could be semi-annually or
annually. Some of them receive important bux fixes thus constituting
Long Term Releases.

Or stable vs unstable branches in github.

In two days on the 25th of July it will be exactly 2 years after the
last release of 4.2.   :-)

A point to consider as well is that what Juan is doing constitutes a
trunk from which releases are forked from time to time by other
people. The ones who run Feature Tests ....

--Hannes

On 7/23/15, Juan Vuletich <juan at jvuletich.org> wrote:
> On 7/19/2015 9:39 PM, Phil (list) wrote:
>> ...
>> It really comes down to what is Cuis?  Is it:
>>
>> 1) a minimal Smalltalk that you play around with ideas / prototype
>> something in the short to intermediate term
>>
>> 2) a platform that you can take that idea you were playing around with,
>> and if it proves out, build something more substantial from for the
>> longer term
>>
>> 3) a completely experimental environment.  Anything can change at any
>> time.  Supporting 1 is doable but 2 is doubtful.
>>
>> Right now, Cuis is great at 1 but seems like it should be able to handle
>> both 1 and 2 if a bit of stability gets added.  I don't think it's 3 at
>> all, but who knows, others may disagree.  If others look at it
>> differently, I'd love to know how you look at Cuis.
>
> I want Cuis to be both 1 and 2. If we are not there yet, we'd walk that
> way.
>
> Cheers,
> Juan Vuletich
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cuis mailing list
> Cuis at jvuletich.org
> http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org
>