[Cuis] Was a consensus reached re: HTTP/HTTPS?

[H. Hirzel]

+1 for having a web package in
https://github.com/Cuis-Smalltalk/Cuis-Smalltalk-Dev/tree/master/Packages

Has a consensus ben reached?

On 3/8/15, Phil (list) <pbpublist at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 10:18 -0500, David Graham wrote:
>> Hi Phil,
>>
>> I just pulled down the Cuis4.2-2203 along with Cog 3266, and the WebClient
>> package seems to work fine with both the client and server examples on my
>> Mac (Sorry, I still haven’t had a chance to get back to work on the
>> tests).  You will want to install the Cuis Core-Packages, then
>> Cuis-DigitalSignatures, Cuis-UUID, and finally the Cuis-WebClient packages
>> from my repo.
>>
>
> Thanks for commenting David.  That's what I was trying to understand...
> WebClient from your repo seems to be working as expected for me.  Since
> HTTP client/server code is a pretty key bit of functionality for many
> types of apps and there doesn't seem to be the time/interest in working
> on Zinc right now, should we look at making this a core package?  (of
> course, we could always switch in the future if that makes sense down
> the road)
>
>> garduino, Sorry, I took a look at your pull request and it’s adds 8K LOC
>> to a 5K LOC project.  I’d like to keep this as close to the Cuis base as
>> possible and avoid compatibility libraries.
>>
>
> We're a small enough community that divergent forks are not a great idea
> if we can avoid them.  I've already retired my FFI port and am doing the
> same with my XML-Parser port as core packages now exist for both.  It
> would be great if we could try to keep to a common code base where
> possible...
>
>> Thanks,
>> David
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cuis mailing list
>> Cuis at jvuletich.org
>> http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cuis mailing list
> Cuis at jvuletich.org
> http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org
>