[Cuis] OMeta 2

[Phil (list)]

On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 09:26 +0000, H. Hirzel wrote:
> Thanks for the update, Phil
> 
> I added an issue https://github.com/pbella/Cuis-Ports/issues/3 for
> updating the installation instructions.
> 
> I can do it and issue a pull request but probably not today.
> 

No need, I will copy and paste what you have already done into the
readme.

> --Hannes
> 
> 
> On 5/23/15, Phil (list) <pbpublist at gmail.com> wrote:
> > OK, OMeta is now written in OMeta again.
> >
> > On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 18:03 -0400, Phil (list) wrote:
> >> I just pushed out an update that alters the instructions a bit:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 05:54 +0000, H. Hirzel wrote:
> >> > C. File in in the  following sequence
> >> >       - OMeta2-stage1.st
> >> >       - OMeta2-stage2a.st
> >> >       - OMeta2-stage2b.st
> >>
> >> Should now read:
> >>
> >> C. File in / install in the following sequence
> >> - OMeta2-stage1.st
> >> - OMeta2.pck.st
> >> - OMeta2Tests.pck.st (optional)
> >>
> >> (It turns out I needed to hurry up and get it packaged because I screwed
> >> up: some of the most important rewrites in OMeta (the OMeta2 class
> >> itself and a couple others) aren't currently in the repo.  These are
> >> critical because it's not only the most current, but also the best
> >> documentation on OMeta 2 syntax.  Now that the existing code packaged,
> >> we will be able to diff this commit and my next one to see only what is
> >> changing going from Smalltalk to 'pure' OMeta 2 syntax should anything
> >> go wrong.  It might be tomorrow before the next commit is ready...)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Phil
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cuis mailing list
> > Cuis at jvuletich.org
> > http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Cuis mailing list
> Cuis at jvuletich.org
> http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org