[Cuis] IPFS on Smalltalk

[Joe Shirk]

I don't know why I wrote 'Squeak' -- too much reading, I guess. I meant
Pharo. My thinking was to make it work there first, then port to cuis and
newspeak if there is a benefit in doing that. Perhaps that's not the best
way to go about it. Any thoughts on this?

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Joe Shirk <j.b.shirk at gmail.com> wrote:

> To me, this system implemented in smalltalk, and I suppose that should be
> squeak and amber, will make it possible to build distributed apps, because
> the app itself can be an object, not only its content or data. Implementing
> in smalltalk should mean that the complexity involved would be more easily
> managed with few bugs, compared to say, javascript or node.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://jvuletich.org/pipermail/cuis_jvuletich.org/attachments/20150824/b1f94f7a/attachment-0004.html>