[Cuis] Was a consensus reached re: HTTP/HTTPS?

[H. Hirzel]

Yes, Germán's approach has its merit as well. It was to avoid forking
WebClient as much as possible and thus relying on a compatibility
layer.

In any case WebClient for Cuis is a fork and needs to be maintained.
But this applies for all of the packages in the common repository.

I remember that the late Andreas Raab wrote he did about 3 to 4
attempts until he came up with WebClient. Zinc then was a fork of it
at that time.

--Hannes



On 3/10/15, Germán Arduino <garduino at gmail.com> wrote:
> Mine was a different approach, I tried to make the minimun possible changes
> to WC itself and rely on a compatibility layer, to make more easy the
> follow up of the maintenance of the official release.
>
> But if the current packages from David are working I'm not against of the
> propossed approach and I will delete my fork.
>
>
> 2015-03-10 11:28 GMT-03:00 H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com>:
>
>> I use WebClient on Squeak. Not used so far with Cuis. Please go ahead
>> with the proposal.
>>
>> --Hannes
>>
>> On 3/10/15, Ken.Dickey <Ken.Dickey at whidbey.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 10:00:09 -0300
>> > Juan Vuletich <juan at jvuletich.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> In particular, wrt HTTP/HTTPS, I don't have much knowledge about the
>> >> options, and I'm not using any of them. So, I prefer you guys to make
>> >> the decision.
>> > ...
>> >
>> >> - Or (like me) you don't really know, and you prefer those who know
>> >> better decide?
>> >
>> > Not a user.  No informed opinion.
>> >
>> > -KenD
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Cuis mailing list
>> > Cuis at jvuletich.org
>> > http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cuis mailing list
>> Cuis at jvuletich.org
>> http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Saludos / Regards,
> Germán Arduino
> www.arduinosoftware.com
>