[Cuis] Choosing an HTTP framework
Juan Vuletich
juan at jvuletich.org
Wed May 23 07:40:26 CDT 2012
Hi Folks,
I'm starting this thread to have a clear discussion about this.
In a different thread, Casey said:
>> I've been struggling to get WebClient/WebServer working in Cuis for
awhile now.
Germán said:
>> As I've said before I adapted some stuff to make a compatibility layer
>> with Pharo, to permit install smoothly new versions of Zinc (This is
>> the goal). But started to check big differences at encoding level....
I said:
>> I agree. Let's start this by sharing the work... Please answer to this
>> mail with any alternatives you know of (please include a link to the
>> most current code). I'll compile the list, and maybe if we discuss pros
>> and cons, we can settle on one. Then we'll decide if we want to be
>> compatible with it, or to port it (and maintain it).
We need to pick an http framework. It would be best to be compatible
with the most used and best maintained one, and not fork it. I haven't
been following them, so I can't say much. So far, candidates would be
Zinc and WebClient/WebServer. Anyone suggest other options? Germán,
Casey, please answer to this threads with comments on the status of your
efforts, links to code, what you expect to be able to do and how we can
do it together.
Cheers,
Juan Vuletich
More information about the Cuis
mailing list